Lutzer defends Calvinism on all points which is a false gospel not first delivered unto the saints. The Bible says in order to be regenerated (born-again, new birth, substitution, co-death, receive eternal life and the Holy Spirt) you need to repent and believe in Christ. That's OSAS Arminian.

Whereas Lutzer says you can't repent and believe unless God irresistibly gives you the Holy Spirit to make you repent and believe so that you must be regenerated before you can repent and believe.

Does it not stand to reason then no matter what, these are two different gospels. One leads to having to assume you were irresistibly selected so you did not have to nor could you repent and believe to be regenerated. The other is OSAS Arminian which says Jesus died for all (unlimited atonement) not just for some (limited atonement). And grace is resistible not irresistible; election is conditional not unconditional.

And isn't it odd instead of preservation of the saints (OSAS Arminian), Calvinists teach works based perseverance of the saints. They are irresistibly forced to persevere to keep saved. Sounds like works to me, irresistibly imposed.

In Calvinism people are born for Hell with no opportunity for salvation (called preterition) and the Calvinist prides himself on this that he is not one of those. It's just evil. Lutzer even defended Calvin killing Servetus who was an Anabaptist. Servetus wasn't a Christian, for he was a non-Trinitarian, but he shouldn't be killed for that. He didn't consider himself to be an Anabaptist but he was.

The Jews were born for the gas chambers with no opportunity of escape just like reprobates in Calvinism are given no opportunity for salvation. Hitler's Aryan race are irresistibly selected just like Calvinists claim they are as well.

If Calvinists are saved I would rather go to Hell, because apparently it is not a sin to be a Calvinist then.