Re: http://en.fairmormon.org/Book_of_Mor...Animals/Cattle

That's funny. In response to no cows in the Americas until after Columbus, Mormons say when the word "cow" was used it was really meant to mean buffalo. Funny. A cow is a cow. A buffalo is a buffalo. Whenever you get in a pickle you can't just change the meaning of the world. Now you have to distinguish between a cow buffalo and a cow cow? Funny.

And the claim the word "cow" was used in the Americas must be substantiated by someone other than a Mormon.

If there were so many cows as stated in in 1 Neph. 18.25 why are there no skeletal remains anywhere? There should be lots like we do for other animals. I don't think Mormons care about the truth. They only care about rationalizing their flesh come hell or highwater.



Now Mormon scholars, I use that word loosely, admit there was no genetic connection to the Amerindians that can be found because they claim their Lehites, Nephites and other phites were relatively isolated. How can a battle on Cumorah with over a million Lehite descendants not get transmitted in DNA with Amerindians? Funny.

By the way why are Mormon terms so subliminal? For example cum sounds like part of the word Cumorah. Black laminites sound lame.