While the propositions above are not demonstrated, the argument is linear, so I take no issue with it.Originally Posted by Churchwork
This part doesn't follow from the first part at all. The first part of section (1) addresses sin, and the limitation of time. The second part, despite having "and thus" in front of it, is completely unconnected to the first part, and then adds "since none can compare to Christ." While that may be true, you have not demonstrated it, so it can't be said to be part of the proof (unless more information is added).And thus, we know we were created by uncreated, God of the Bible, since none can compare to Christ.
Here, I'm assuming that when you write "proof", you're referring to a logical proof. Having broken two rules of logic in the first section already, it's safe to say that your proof is broken.
I'm not interested in the money you've offered (if I were, then I would be breaking the rules of your forum) so that's not the issue. I'm interested in good arguments.
The first part of your proof is clearly broken, so let's deal with that before we go on.
Bookmarks