Nowhere have I said that anyone needs to be god in order to know if god exists.
That which does not exist by default can not cause anything because it does not exist. That is not to say that something which is causeless is caused by something that doesn't exist.
I'm not aware of any problems with infinite regress, you just keep repeating that if there was an infinite amount of regression I would have happened. How can you demonstrate this? Just saying it isn't enough, you need to demonstrate that it's true. What evidence is there for this?
Please remember that I have not said that something can come from nothing. I have only said that the argument that everything is caused is not proven.
Something coming from something without a cause has nothing to do with double talk. Often the nucleus of an atom (something) will emit ionizing particles (something coming from something) with no known cause. This is the idea of something coming from something without a cause. "Coming from" is not a causal statement.
Please show me where I said that you needed to know everything, then show me where I said you didn't again. If you can't show me this, then you are uttering falsehood.
Please prove that the universe needs a cause before you teach what the universe's cause is.
First, what makes a bird's house lesser than the bird? What makes anything lesser than another thing? And what makes you think that we can't get abiogenesis to work?
I did not say that repeatable causation is scientific.
Why can't nature have always existed? Please prove that it could not.
Inductive logic
Inductive reasoning, also known as induction or inductive logic, or educated guess in colloquial English, is a kind of reasoning that allows for the possibility that the conclusion is false even where all of the premises are true.[1] The premises of an inductive logical argument indicate some degree of support (inductive probability) for the conclusion but do not entail it; that is, they do not ensure its truth. Induction is employed, for example, in the following argument:
All of the ice we have examined so far is cold.
Therefore, all ice is cold.
You are using the same logic
All of the things we have seen have causes
Therefore, everything is caused
Inductive logic doesn't prove anything. It only suggests it.
Bookmarks